Quantcast
Channel: For What It's Worth
Viewing all 3041 articles
Browse latest View live

38th Ward Ald. Nicholas Sposato announces judicial picks for upcoming primary

$
0
0

38th Ward Ald. Nicholas Sposato isn't running for Committeeman; State Sen. Rob Martwick has no opposition in that race (although he does have a contest in his bid to retain his seat in the Senate).

However, Sposato used to be Committeeman. Perhaps he got in the habit of making endorsements then. In any event, he's issued a number of endorsements for the upcoming primary, including many in judicial races.

Specifically, Sposato has endorsed Justice Jessie G. Reyes for the Supreme Court and Judge Carolyn Gallagher for the Neville, Jr. vacancy on the Appellate Court.

In other judicial races, Sposato has made the following endorsements:

Countywide

Elizabeth "Beth" Ryan -- Coghlan vacancy
Suzanne Therese McEneely -- Larsen vacancy
Jennifer Patricia Callahan -- Mason vacancy
Michael O'Malley -- McCarthy vacancy
Amanda "Mandy" Pillsbury -- Murphy Gorman vacancy
Heather Anne Kent -- O'Brien vacancy
Lorraine Mary Murphy -- Roti vacancy
James Samuel Worley -- K. Sheehan vacancy

In the race for the McGing vacancy in the 10th Subcircuit, Ald. Sposato has endorsed John Garrido.

Tribune judicial endorsements stick close to the Democratic Party slate

$
0
0
The Chicago Tribune began its judicial endorsements yesterday, urging readers to choose P. Scott Neville, Jr., the slated candidate of the Cook County Democratic Party, for the Supreme Court.

The paper continues its endorsements today, announcing its choices for the two Appellate Court and the 12 of the 13 countywide vacancies. (There is no contest for the Patti vacancy.)

In its editorial today, the Tribune also stays close to the Democratic Party's slate, departing from it on only three occasions. Slating is not mentioned in the editorial, however. Instead, today's editorial states that the Tribune makes its endorsements in reliance on "candidates’ ratings from the Chicago Bar Association, the Chicago Council of Lawyers, the Illinois State Bar Association and the editorial board’s own questionnaires and research."

Essentially, the Tribune seems to have disqualified anyone who did not "meet the standards of at least one bar group." In the race for the Roti vacancy, for example, the Tribune rejected the Democratic Party's slated candidate because she "was found not qualified by the Illinois State Bar Association." Former Judge Russell W. Hartigan was endorsed for the C. Sheehan vacancy because both of his opponents "received a 'not recommended' rating from at least one bar group."

In the only other race in which the Tribune departed from the Democratic Party's judicial slate, in the race for the Ford vacancy, former Judge John O'Meara's "Highly Qualified" rating from the Chicago Bar Association was apparently dispositive: "He is endorsed over Laura Ayala-Gonzalez, a supervisor in the state’s attorney’s felony trial division who also received high marks from bar groups" -- but only a "Qualified" from the CBA, not a "Highly Qualified."

Herewith, then, the Tribune's judicial selections to date:

Supreme Court

P. Scott Neville, Jr. -- Freeman vacancy

Appellate Court

Michael B. Hyman -- Neville, Jr. vacancy
John Griffin -- Simon vacancy

Circuit Court Countywide

Kerrie Maloney Laytin -- Bellows vacancy
James T. Derico, Jr. -- Coghlan vacancy
John O'Meara -- Ford vacancy
Celestia L. Mays -- Funderburk vacancy
Levander "Van" Smith, Jr. -- Larsen vacancy
Chris Stacey -- Mason vacancy
Teresa Molina -- McCarthy vacancy
Sheree Desiree Henry -- Murphy Gorman vacancy
Lloyd James Brooks -- O'Brien vacancy
Lorraine Mary Murphy -- Roti vacancy
Russell W. Hartigan -- C. Sheehan vacancy
Jill Rose Quinn -- K. Sheehan vacancy

Welcome, voters! If you are interested in voting for judicial candidates in Cook County, please take a Democratic primary ballot

$
0
0
That is not a partisan request.

It is a statement of reality.

There are no Republicans running for countywide judicial office in Cook County. Not for the Supreme Court, not for the Appellate Court, not for any countywide vacancy. Out of all the subcircuit vacancies in Cook County, there are only two in which Republicans have filed and there is a primary contest in only one race.

If you, the voter, wants to have any say in who serves as a judge in this county, you must vote in the Democratic Primary on St. Patrick's Day. Because the winners of those contests will almost certainly be sworn in for full terms on the first Monday in December.

I realize that some people shy away from voting in primaries because they don't want anyone to know whether they are a Republican or a Democrat. Or maybe some people think they aren't Democrats, so they don't want to vote in a Democratic Primary.

If you are one of these, I have news for you: You don't need to "be" a Democrat, whatever that means, to vote in the Democratic Primary.

You don't even have to "be" a Democrat to be the front-runner for the Democratic Party's presidential nomination.

Photo credit: Scott Eisen/ Getty Images

Just ask Bernie Sanders.

FWIW readers already know this, of course. But think of your friends and relations who don't. Spread the word: If you want to vote for judge in Cook County, you must vote in the primary election and you must take a Democratic ballot.

Now, then, switching topics slightly -- but not entirely -- I have noticed that some would-be FWIW commenters have become downright vaporish about a person who has consorted with known Republicans, who has actually claimed to "be" a Republican (whatever that means), but who has filed to run for judge as a Democrat in the 10th Subcircuit.

Invasion! Fraud! Subterfuge!

Oh, please.

All this means is that the person in question wants to be a judge. Because there is no way for a resident of the 10th Subcircuit to become a judge unless one runs in the Democratic Primary.

At some point in the future it may be different, but right now -- in this election cycle -- in Cook County -- Republicans are irrelevant. To have any say in the affairs of our commonwealth one must participate in, not only the democratic process (small d), but also the Democratic Party (capitals intended).

With all the nervous upset about John Garrido, I'm almost afraid to mention that there is another person running in the 13th Subcircuit, as a Democrat, who actually ran for judge in the 13th Subcircuit in the 2018 primary as a Republican.

I'll pause now, whilst some of our readers fan themselves and mop their brows.

Feeling better?

Look, the explanation here is equally simple. Until 2018 no Democratic candidate had ever been elected judge in the 13th Subcircuit. In 2018 only Democrats were elected to the bench in that far northwest suburban enclave. The person in question wants to be a judge. She has determined that, at least for this election cycle, even in the northwest suburbs, the only place to go in order to achieve that ambition is the Democratic Primary.

In a one-party state (and, for now, Cook County certainly appears to qualify) everyone who wants to participate in politics must be a Party member.

We're telling voters that they have to take a Democratic ballot in order to have a say in who serves on the Cook County bench. Why are any of us surprised, then, when persons who want to serve on the bench, choose to run in the Democratic Primary?

Judge assigned to administrative duties after putting youngster in lockup

$
0
0
Andy Grimm has tweeted an update to his February 27 story on the on the Chicago Sun-Times website:


For now, anyway, it appears that Judge Jackie Portman-Brown locked up her 6-year old grandniece, apparently at the request of the child's mother.

According to several news outlets, Portman-Brown has been assigned to administrative duties pending a March 4 meeting of the Circuit Court Executive Committee.

Portman-Brown was elected (as Jackie Marie Portman) to a 5th Subcircuit vacancy in 2008. She did not submit her credentials for bar association screening in that election cycle. However, she did submit for screening when she ran for retention in 2014, and was found recommended for retention at that time by each of the Alliance bar groups and also by the CBA.

I found a number of what, for me, were baffling comments on Facebook -- about cowbells and 99.999999...% -- but I eventually also found a link to this largely flattering 2016 piece, by Maya Dukmasova, on the Chicago Reader website, "Cook County's most unconventional judge takes justice beyond the bench," and this explained the Facebook references.

No countywide Circuit Court candidates on Speaker Madigan's palm card

$
0
0
Rich Miller had this on Capitol Faxyesterday (and an update to the post acknowledged that he was not the first to note that Kim Foxx was left off):


And, admittedly, the omission of Kim Foxx may be the bigger story. That was certainly the angle that Second City Cop played up this morning.

But, um, there's something else missing here, too: There's not one single countywide Circuit Court candidate, slated or otherwise, on this card.

Proving once again, there is slatingand there is slating.

Tribune makes endorsements in subcircuit races

$
0
0
The Chicago Tribunecompletes its judicial endorsements today with the announcement of its choices in contested Cook County Subcircuit races.

In Democratic Primary contests the Tribune made the following endorsements:

2nd Subcircuit

Sondra Nicole Denmark -- "A" vacancy

3rd Subcircuit

Regina Ann Mescall -- Flynn vacancy
Erin Haggerty Antonietti -- Murphy vacancy

6th Subcircuit

Jamie Guerra Dickler -- Nega vacancy
Anthony Lucafo -- Pantle vacancy

7th Subcircuit

Marcia O'Brien Conway -- Jackson vacancy

8th Subcircuit

Bradley R. Trowbridge -- Fleming vacancy

9th Subcircuit

Thomas M. Cushing -- Axlerood vacancy
Julie Bess Aimen -- Luckman vacancy

10th Subcircuit

Maire Aileen Dempsey -- McGing vacancy
Mary Catherine Marubio -- O'Brien vacancy

12th Subcircuit

Howard J. Wise -- Hanlon vacancy

13th Subcircuit

Susanne Michele Groebner -- Kulys Hoffman vacancy

14th Subcircuit

Gerardo Tristan, Jr. -- Bertucci vacancy
Daniel O. Tiernan -- Lacy vacancy

15th Subcircuit

Nichole C. Patton -- Griffin vacancy

And, for those of you standing by for the Tribune's choices in judicial races on the Republican primary ballot, please be advised that the Tribune supports Gary William Seyring over Angel Garcia in the 13th Subcircuit. Because that's the one and only judicial contest on the entire Republican primary ballot. (Frank R. DiFranco is running unopposed for the Republican nomination in the 12th Subcircuit. And that's the entire universe of Republican judicial candidates in Cook County.)

Keely Patricia Hillison: In her own words

$
0
0
Keely Patricia Hillison is a candidate for the countywide Murphy Gorman vacancy. Her punch number is 210.


I am the candidate with civil litigation experience, and plenty of it. I worked for thirty years as an associate and then partner at the Parrillo Weiss law firm in Chicago before launching my own law firm, Keely Hillison Law LLC, in which I continue my substantial civil litigation practice.

I have a unique combination of trial court, appellate court, and arbitration experience. For thirty plus years, I have worked in courtrooms on a daily basis, both downtown and at suburban courthouses, learning and practicing the rules of evidence and rules of civil procedure along the way. My experience includes dozens of jury and non-jury trials and hundreds of mandatory arbitration hearings in personal injury, property damage, insurance coverage and contract cases. For almost twenty years, I have also served as an arbitrator of mandatory arbitration hearings in the Circuit Court of Cook County, presiding at evidentiary hearings and making the same types of rulings that judges make.

I have briefed hundreds of appeals and have argued appeals in the Supreme Court of Illinois, the Appellate Court of Illinois, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. I have researched and written about many legal issues which judges and attorneys encounter during trials but seldom have time to research in depth. The knowledge and skills I have acquired through working on so many appeals will help me to apply the law correctly and impartially as a judge.

I represent plaintiffs and defendants, individuals and companies, and as a judge I will apply the law fairly and impartially to all, based upon the admissible evidence. Having been a personal injury plaintiff myself, I appreciate how much the lives of real people depend on the proper functioning of the court system and will strive to run a courtroom efficiently and effectively.

I am a mentor to new attorneys through a Chicago Bar Association program. I have served the Appellate Lawyers Association as co-chair of the Moot Court Committee, co-chair of the Sponsorship Committee, Member of the Board of Directors, and Moot Court Judge. I am also a proud member of the Women's Bar Association of Illinois.

I grew up in Cook County and raised my children here, too, volunteering with schools, Girl Scouts, and Boy Scouts. My daughter now teaches English to high school students, and my son volunteers with me at a local animal shelter. My husband is an attorney in Chicago, and we live in Western Springs.

Raising a son with special needs has taught me so much. Above all, I learned to be calm, patient, practical and respectful with everyone, even, and especially, in difficult situations. Between my experience at home and my experience at work, I am prepared to deal with anyone or anything I may encounter as a judge and to do so fairly, courteously and effectively. Throughout my thirty years of courtroom experience, I have observed many judges in action. I have seen what works and what doesn't work in a courtroom. I have acquired incomparable knowledge and skills, which have served my clients well and will help me to serve
the people of Cook County and Illinois as a judge. I have the knowledge, experience, integrity, patience and temperament to be a good judge.

---------------------------------------

Ed. note: This candidate's campaign website is newly added to the Sidebar.

Alliance grids -- further updates

$
0
0
The Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening has released updated ratings for persons seeking election to judicial office in Cook County in the March primary.

As always, my sincere thanks to Alliance Administrator Joyce Williams for sharing these with FWIW.

The Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening is comprised of the Arab American Bar Association (AABAR) (this is the newest Alliance member), the Asian American Bar Association of Greater Chicago (AABA), the Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago (BWLA), the Chicago Council of Lawyers (CCL), the Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), the Decalogue Society of Lawyers (DSL), the Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois (HBA), the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois (HLAI), the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA), the Lesbian and Gay Bar Association of Chicago (LAGBAC), the Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois (PRBA), and the Women's Bar Association of Illinois (WBAI), working collaboratively to improve the process of screening judicial candidates in Cook County, Illinois.

The Alliance does not include the Chicago Bar Association (CBA), which maintains its own evaluation process.

Candidates seeking screening from the Alliance must complete a lengthy questionnaire (a questionnaire that is similar to, but sufficiently different from, the separate CBA questionnaire that completion of one will not suffice for the other). Investigators are then assigned by the Alliance from any of the member groups; thus, members of Alliance groups are not necessarily involved in the vetting of any one candidate's written application -- calling references (including lawyers that have been on the other side of the candidate's cases), reviewing written submissions, and so forth. When that phase of the investigation is completed, however, and after medical waivers and ARDC (or JIB) waivers are obtained, a hearing is scheduled for the applicant. All Alliance groups are asked to participate in these hearings. Each evaluator at the hearings (representing one or more Alliance members) will have the benefit of the Alliance investigators' work, even though the investigators may not be associated with the evaluator's bar group.

So all the Alliance members start with the same investigative materials, and participate in the same candidate interviews -- but, because each group has their own evaluators present for the interviews, they do not always reach the same conclusions.

The CBA issues written findings explaining its evaluations. Two of the Alliance members, the ISBA and the CCL, issue written findings to the public as well. The other Alliance members may or may not explain their ratings to individual candidates; whether they do or do not, however, these explanations are not made public.

Much of the evaluation process is confidential. Candidates do not learn which lawyers said what about them, good or bad. Candidates and evaluators all sign promises not to disclose what is said at a candidate's interview.

Different Alliance groups give different ratings. Some Alliance groups will issue no rating other than Qualified/Not Qualified or Recommended/Not Recommended. The Chicago Bar Association issues a Highly Qualified Rating, as do some Alliance members. Others offer a Highly Recommended rating. The CCL issues positive ratings of Qualified, Well Qualified, or Highly Qualified.

As you review these grids, keep in mind that, HQ = Highly Qualified, WQ = Well Qualified, Q = Qualified, NQ = Not Qualified, HR = Highly Recommended, R = Recommended, and NR = Not Recommended.

All Alliance members automatically give an "NR" rating to candidates who do not have enough years in practice or who failed or refused to participate in the evaluation process.

There are very few blanks left in the grids. But in these cases, a member association has not yet finished its rating or the candidate is appealing a rating and the appeal process is not yet complete. Several squares are marked with the symbol 1. In these cases, the Alliance member was unable to get an evaluator, or a sufficient number of evaluators as required by its own bylaws, to a particular candidate's hearing. The reader will see many of these symbols in the AABAR column. In at least some of these cases, the Alliance may have decided, as permitted by its bylaws, to use a prior, but still recent evaluation of a candidate; it is my understanding that some of these evaluations may predate the AABAR's participation in the Alliance.

If there are further updates, I will post them.

With all this firmly in mind, then, herewith the Alliance grids (click on any image to enlarge or clarify):


Now... if you want to see what the Chicago Council of Lawyers said about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, just click on the links in this sentence.

Similarly, if you want to see what the Illinois State Bar Association about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, click on the links in this sentence.

And, finally, if you want to go outside the grids and see what the Chicago Bar Association said about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, just click on the links in this sentence.

American Middle East Voters Alliance Political Action Committee issues Cook County judicial endorsements

$
0
0
The American Middle East Voters Alliance Political Action Committee (AMVOTE PAC) has issued endorsements in several Cook County judicial races.

For the Illinois Supreme Court, AMVOTE PAC has endorsed Justice Jesse G. Reyes. For the Appellate Court, AMVOTE PAC endorses Justice Michael B. Hyman for the Neville, Jr. vacancy and Justice John Griffin for the Simon vacancy.

In contested Cook County Circuit Court races, AMVOTE PAC has made the following endorsements:

Countywide Vacancies

Kerrie Maloney Laytin -- Bellows vacancy
Aileen Bhandari -- Coghlan vacancy
Laura Ayala-Gonzalez -- Ford vacancy
Celestia L. Mays -- Funderburk vacancy
Levander "Van" Smith, Jr. -- Larsen vacancy
Chris Stacey -- Mason vacancy
Teresa Molina -- McCarthy vacancy
Sheree Desiree Henry -- Murphy Gorman vacancy
Araceli Reyes De La Cruz -- Roti vacancy
Russell W. Hartigan -- C. Sheehan vacancy
Jill Rose Quinn -- K. Sheehan vacancy

Subcircuit Vacancies

Sondra Nicole Denmark -- 2nd Subcircuit, "A" vacancy

David A. Bonoma -- 3rd Subcircuit, Flynn vacancy
Erin Haggerty Antonietti -- 3rd Subcircuit, Murphy vacancy

Jamie Guerra Dickler -- 6th Subcircuit, Nega vacancy
Eileen Marie O'Connor -- 6th Subcircuit, Pantle vacancy

Jonathan Clark Green -- 8th Subcircuit, Fleming vacancy

Michael Alan Strom -- 9th Subcircuit, Luckman vacancy

Jon Stromsta -- 10th Subcircuit, McGing vacancy

Patricia M. Fallon -- 12th Subcircuit, Hanlon vacancy

Matt Flamm -- 13th Subcircuit, Kulys Hoffman vacancy

Gerardo Tristan, Jr. -- 14th Subcircuit, Bertucci vacancy
Daniel O. Tiernan -- 14th Subcircuit, Lacy vacancy

Heather Mulligan Begley -- 15th Subcircuit, Griffin vacancy

AMVOTE PAC endorsed Junaid Aleef for Kane County State's Attorney -- but makes no endorsement in the Cook County State's Attorney's race. It endorsed Richard Boykin for Clerk of the Cook County Circuit Court. It also involved itself in one, and only one, Ward Committeeman's race, endorsing Debra Silverstein in the 50th Ward.

Ald. Michele Smith makes endorsements in several Cook County judicial races

$
0
0
Forty-third Ward Ald. Michele Smith has released a list of her endorsements for the March primary.

Smith has endorsed Justice Nathaniel Roosevelt Howse for the Illinois Supreme Court and Justices Michael B. Hyman (Neville, Jr. vacancy) and John Griffin (Simon vacancy) for the Appellate Court.

Smith's endorsements track the Cook County Democratic Party's endorsements in countywide races for the Circuit Court with three exceptions. Smith has announced support for former Judge John O'Meara in the race for the Ford vacancy, for Lorraine Mary Murphy in the race for the Roti vacancy, and for former Judge Russell W. Hartigan for the C. Sheehan vacancy.

In the contest for the Fleming vacancy in the 8th Subcircuit, Smith notes that she has endorsed both Jonathan Clark Green and Bradley R. Trowbridge in prior races, saying it is 'unfortunate' that they are now running against each other. "They are both qualified," she writes.

In other races of interest to FWIW readers, Smith has endorsed Bill Conway for Cook County State's Attorney and Michael M. Cabonargi for Clerk of the Circuit Court.

Justice Charles E. Freeman, 1933-2020

$
0
0
It was a very brief retirement. It was only in June 2018 that Justice Freeman stepped down from the Illinois Supreme Court. Herewith the Supreme Court's complete statement regarding the passing of Justice Charles E. Freeman:

Justice Charles E. Freeman, who had a long and distinguished career on the Illinois Supreme Court from 1990 to 2018 and was the first African American to serve on the Court and as Chief Justice,passed away on March 2, 2020. He was 86.

“It is with great sadness that I have learned of the passing of Justice Charles E. Freeman. Charles and I had been acquaintances for several decades before I joined the court, having often attended many of the same social events,” Chief Justice Anne M. Burke said. “However, we became close friends once we became colleagues and I considered Charles to be my mentor. He was a gentleman and a truly gracious individual. I never heard him say an unkind word about anyone. He was a consensus builder and treated everyone equally and with respect.”

Chief Justice Burke continued: “Justice Freeman was also a trailblazer. He was the first African American to become a member of the court and the first African American Chief Justice, positions he held with dignity and integrity. He was an accomplished jurist as well, serving the court with skill for almost 30years.“Justice Freeman was a devoted family man. He was married to the love of his life, Marylee for more than 50 years. Charles once told me that Marylee would slip a little love note into his suitcase every time he travelled to Springfield. I knew then that they had one of those storybook romances –- everlasting. Charles was also a loving father to his son, Kevin, and daughter-in-law Cami, and a devoted grandfather to his grandchildren, Skye and Miles.

“He will be greatly missed.”

Born in Richmond, Virginia, on December 12, 1933, Freeman descended from slaves freed by Quakers before the American Civil War. He earned his Bachelor of Arts from Virginia Union University in 1954 and earned his Juris Doctor from the John Marshall Law School in 1962.

In private practice from 1962-1976, Freeman also served as an Illinois assistant attorney general, Cook County assistant state's attorney, and assistant attorney for the County Board of Election Commissioners. He was appointed by Illinois Gov. Otto Kerner as an arbitrator with the Illinois Industrial Commission, where for nine years he heard thousands of work-related injury cases. Then from 1973-1976, under Gov. Dan Walker, he served on the Illinois Commerce Commission.

“It is a very sad day. When Justice Freeman retired, we lost his incredible institutional knowledge about the workings of the court,” Justice Thomas L. Kilbride said. “He really left his mark with a vast array of legal writings –- both majority and dissent.”

Freeman won election to the Cook County Circuit Court in 1976 and served for 10 years. During that tenure he was the first AfricanAmerican to swear in a Chicago Mayor, when he administered the oath of office in 1983 to his longtime friend, Harold Washington. For several years, the two attorneys had shared an office in Chicago.

“Charles and I came from very different backgrounds, and we didn’t always see eye-to-eye on the law, but he was always one of my closest friends on the court,” said retired Justice Robert R. Thomas. “We shared so many great laughs over the years, and I will miss him dearly.”

Elected to the First District Appellate Court in 1986, Freeman served that same year as Presiding Judge of the Third Division and as a member of the First District Executive Committee. In 1990, in a First Judicial District election to fill the Illinois Supreme Court vacancy of Seymour Simon, Freeman defeated Republican Robert Chapman Buckley 62 percent to 38 percent.

One of Freeman’s most publicized cases was the 1994 decision involving DuPage County defendant Rolando Cruz, convicted of kidnapping, raping, and murdering 10-year-old Jeanine Nicarico, despite no physical evidence linking him to the crime. The Illinois Supreme Court in 1990 and 1992 upheld Cruz’s conviction and death sentence, but heard the case again in 1994, after a sheriff’s lieutenant admitted he had lied under oath about Cruz’s statements regarding the murder. In delivering the People v. Cruz opinion reversing his conviction, Justice Freeman considered the “impact our decision will have upon Jeanine Nicarico’s surviving family and friends.” Yet, he reasoned, “we are duty bound to play a larger role in preserving that very basic guarantee of our democratic society, that every person, however culpable, is entitled to a fair and impartial trial. We cannot deviate from the obligation of that role.” Another man eventually admitted to the murder, and in 2002 Cruz received a pardon from Governor George Ryan.

In 1997, the Supreme Court justices chose Freeman to serve as Chief Justice, succeeding Justice James Heiple to become the first African American to lead a branch of Illinois government. Asked about the significance of being the first African American Chief Justice, Freeman responded, “I’m an African American who now has become chief judge; I’m not an African American chief justice. I have no different perception on what course I would take because of my heritage.” Freeman won retention to the Court in 2000 and 2010, both with nearly 80 percent of the vote.

During his tenure as Chief Justice, Freeman oversaw improved efficiency of the Family Violence Prevention program; the establishment of a judicial web page; and the reorganization of the rotation of assignments of appellate judges in the First Judicial District, ending the practice that allowed appellate judges in Cook County to sit on the same panel for their lifetimes.

Freeman was praised for upholding defendants’ rights and advocating prosecutorial reforms. R. Eugene Pincham, who served with Freeman on the Appellate Court, described him as tilting “slightly to the liberal side of the court” and that “probably more often than any justice dissents in criminal cases on the side of protecting” the rights of the accused. In People v. McCauley, the police refused an attorney’s request to see his client when being interrogated. Freeman wrote in his majority opinion that the “day is long past in Illinois, however, where attorneys must shout legal advice to their clients, held in custody, through the jailhouse door. In this case, we determine that our State constitutional guarantees afforded defendant a greater degree of protection.”

In the2011 case In re Jonathan C.B., Justice Freeman dissented in a case that juveniles charged with sex offenses were not entitled to a jury trial. Freeman’s dissent focused on the shackling of juveniles, which not only creates prejudice against the accused, but is an affront against the judicial process. He concluded that “a juvenile respondent has the right to appear in a courtroom free of unnecessary physical restraints unless justification is established.” In 2016, the Supreme Court added Rule 943, which forbids the use of restraints on a minor during court proceedings except for specific reasons.

He also wrote the majority opinion in an adoptive parentage case that the equitable adoption doctrine does not apply to child custody proceedings. Maria and Jim engaged to be married. Maria was Slovakian and adopted Scarlett, also from Slovakia. Jim was not able to adopt Scarlett because he was non-Slovakian. Jim acted as a father and provided necessary support. Jim and Maria never married and broke up ten years later, and Jim asserted his parental rights, custody, and visitation. When the case reached the Supreme Court, Freeman noted that Jim lacked statutory standing to bring a custody petition because Illinois does not recognize functional parents. Only the adoptive mother has statutory parent-child relationship with child.

Freeman responded to a complaint that he appointed a friend to the bench, “I have done nothing different than any other judge who sits with me or any other judge before in the history of the Supreme Court,” he told the Chicago Sun-Times. “We all receive calls. We all receive visits from politicians, from friends who made recommendations for appointments to the bench. We act on them sometimes. Sometimes we do not.”

He expressed pride in having increased the number of African Americans and Jews on the bench, appointing 11 African Americans and nine Jews.

Among the awards and accolades Freeman received were the Freedom Award from the John Marshall Law School, the Seymour Simon Justice Award from the Jewish Judges Association, the Earl Burrus Dickerson Award from the Chicago Bar Association, and the Ira B. Platt Award and the Presidential Award from the Cook County Bar Association.

He is survived by his son, Kevin(wife Cami) Freeman, grandchildren Skye Marie Freeman and Miles Charles Freeman, as well as his brother James Freeman in Richmond, Va. A memorial service hosted in Chicago by the Illinois Supreme Court will be announced at a later date.

Those pesky Russians are back

$
0
0

Top of my comment queue this morning (edited to remove the website link; click to enlarge):


And, just watch, Moose and Squirrel will be blamed for this one, too.

49th Ward Dems announce judicial choices

$
0
0
Committeeman (and State Rep.) Kelly M. Cassidy has provided FWIW with a list of endorsements made by the Democratic Party of the 49th Ward in contested judicial races.

In announcing the organizations choice's, Cassidy noted the 49th Ward's "long tradition of membership driven endorsement processes rather than following the slate."

The Democratic Party of the 49th Ward has endorsed Nathaniel Roosevelt Howse for the Illinois Supreme Court. For the Appellate Court, the 49th Ward has endorsed Justices Michael B. Hyman (Neville, Jr. vacancy) and John Griffin (Simon vacancy).

In contested countywide races for the Circuit Court, the 49th Ward supports the countywide Democratic Party's slate with two exceptions. For the Roti vacancy, the 49th Ward has announced support for James Patrick Crawley and, for the C. Sheehan vacancy, the 49th Ward stands behind Deidre Baumann.

In the 9th Subcircuit, the 49th Ward has announced its endorsement of Judges Thomas M. Cushing (Axelrood vacancy) and Michael Alan Strom (Luckman vacancy). The Democratic Party of the 49th Ward is making no endorsement in the race for the Fleming vacancy in the 8th Subcircuit.

In other races of interest to FWIW readers, the 49th Ward organization has announced support for both Kim Foxx for State's Attorney and Michael M. Cabonargi for Clerk of the Circuit Court.

Chris Stacey: In his own words

$
0
0
Chris Stacey is a candidate for the countywide Mason vacancy. His punch number is 201.


WHY I WANT TO BE JUDGE

I have spent legal career as a trial lawyer in civil practice. Outside my practice I have volunteered in the community is specific ways that make me uniquely qualified to serve a diverse county like Cook.

Though I trust that my representation of clients has made their lives better, I now seek to use my legal experience to impact a broader community. I have realized that my strongest skill set, experience and temperament seem to converge into the position of judge. It is the best way I can use what I have learned to serve the public. Also, a judge once told me that his job was “to get up every morning, be fair, and do right by people”. That resonates with me. Finally, my interest in the judiciary first stems from my work as an extern federal judicial law clerk to the Honorable Charles P. Kocoras nearly 40 years ago.

WHY I AM THE BEST SUITED FOR THE BENCH COMPARED TO MY OPPONENTS

I have the most experience compared to any of my opponents. I built my practice over 37 years successfully representing people in the court room in serious personal injury, wrongful death, product liability and medical malpractice cases. Lawyers who practice in transactional, non-litigation cases have also retained me to represent their clients when they end up in court, including in the areas of bankruptcy, copyright, complex commercial and fraud litigation and probate disputes. I have tried cases in both state and federal court and have also argued cases in the Illinois Appellate Court and Illinois Supreme Court.

I am the most qualified candidate in my race. First, I am the only candidate in my race to have been rated “highly qualified” by the Chicago Bar Association and also found “qualified” or “recommended” by each and every one of the other bar association that rate judicial candidates. The Chicago Tribune noted that fact when it endorsed me over my opponents. Second, the committee in support of my candidacy (See Committee on my web page, www.staceyforjudge.com) includes many prominent litigators and former judges who care deeply about having a quality judiciary. These things show that those in the best position to know – other lawyers and judges with an interest in a quality judiciary – have high confidence in my qualifications to be judge.

My community service makes me uniquely qualified in my race. Three decades of community involvement demonstrate that I am a well-rounded person with detailed pattern of lifetime service to the community and a commitment to help better the lives of a diverse group of people. These unique experiences have helped me better understand people who have different backgrounds from myself and I can take that with me to the bench.

I spent 18 years on the Board of The Cabrini Green Legal Aid clinic, which has brought access to justice to the most marginalized people in our community in the area of criminal law, criminal records, housing and family law.

Prior to that, I spent a decade both doing field work on the ground and on the advisory board of World Relief, International, Chicago Office, assisting vulnerable refugees, asylum seekers and other immigrants from Africa, Asia, the Middle East and Central America seek a new and better life in America after fleeing serious conditions in their countries of origin. The field work included housing families in my own home until being able to get on their feet in their own apartments, helping navigate the complexities of the Cook County hospital system for sick refugees, and raising support and assisting in the furnishing of their new apartments in Chicago.

I have committed many years to safe and environmentally sound transportation, serving on the advisory board to the Active Transportation Alliance and received its Volunteer of the Year Award in 2011 in part for my contribution to developing a crash support program for bicyclists.

I have served on the board and in the field as a Retreat Staff Volunteer of The Crucible Project, which promotes men’s emotional health and aims to interrupt violent and other destructive behavior in men.

I travelled to Zambia, Africa with International Vision Volunteers, helping eye surgeons literally give sight to the blind. I oversaw crowd control, assisted surgeons in operating rooms, performed administrative and record keeping work and comforted patients.

I was elected to the Thomas J. Waters Local School Council for three years.

I spent decade working with Chart (Chicago Artists) a non-profit artist group promoting the relationship between spirituality and the arts. I am a musician, singer and songwriter, and have performed improv comedy at various venues in Chicago.

I am married and raised four children.

MY COMMITMENT

In approaching cases, I will work hard to know the law, study all lawyer submissions, and be decisive. I will follow the law and not legislate from the trial bench. I will respect everyone at all times in and out of the courtroom, both because it is right and because it will inspire confidence in the judiciary. I will listen and understand the circumstances surrounding the case and temper all decisions with compassion and human decency. I believe in equal justice for all.

Injustice Watch has a Judicial Primary Guide

$
0
0
Injustice Watch has announced its own 2020 Judicial Primary Guide. That's a link to the guide in the preceding sentence. When you go look at it, be sure to note the explanatory key:


Hmmmm. Former prosecutors -- not just current ASA's, mind you, but anyone who ever served as a prosecutor at any stage of their career -- are signified by handcuffs. Current or former public defenders, on the other hand, are signified by a neutral little briefcase.

I am not now, and never have been, an Assistant State's Attorney. So I am not complaining about the symbols on that basis.

But I have represented unpopular clients in my day. I hope that I have, at all times, zealously pursued and protected my clients' legitimate interests, within the bounds of the law, while remaining courteous, professional, and civil to all. Sure, I have liked some clients better than others -- the ones that have paid their bills, for example, will always hold a special place in my mercenary heart. Unless we have nothing but concrete between our ears, we lawyers learn from our cases, and from our clients, and we are shaped by them. But we do not become our clients. Even when we like our clients.

For the better part of my first two decades in practice, I worked for a firm that only represented insurance companies. Talk about your unpopular clients....

And if Allstate sneezed, we all caught pneumonia. In the last 20-some years I have also represented a number of other insurers. But that did not prevent me from vigorously and, I hope, effectively representing policyholders when I had those opportunities. And, today, if a commercial featuring Dennis Haysbert or Dennis Quaid comes on the TV, I do not lapse into some sort of reverie.

Why should it be presumed that former prosecutors can not also grow and evolve as they take the next step in their careers, whether it be a seat on the bench or a move into private practice? Here's a Captain Obvious newsflash for the folks at Injustice Watch: When they leave the State's Attorney's Office, most former prosecutors move into criminal defense work.

There are numerous recorded instances, of course, of some former prosecutors remaining staunchly pro-prosecution (or reverting to a staunchly pro-prosecution bias) after ascending to the bench. But that is a problem concerning the individual judge's present, not his or her past. A person who can not move from an adversarial role into a neutral one is going to have problems as a judge. No matter what they did before becoming a judge. And, unfortunately, even with bar evaluations and screenings and investigations, we can't know for certain how someone will behave in a black robe until they have had the opportunity to wear one for real. In this election, as in every one of them that I can recall, there are some current ASA's hoping to move directly to the bench. But does that necessarily mean that all of these folks, if elected, will be unable to shed their adversarial role for the neutral role of a judge?

It does not.

A couple of election cycles ago, one judicial candidate was blistered simply because that candidate had worked for a firm that represented the employer side in labor disputes. At one point, and in some circles still, public defenders have been slammed as being soft on crime. Now, in different circles, prosecutors are the red-headed stepchildren. None of this is right, or fair.

Perry Mason got to pick only innocent clients. He had the distinct advantage of being fictional. In the real world, the rest of us have to do what we can to feed our families. Even when that means representing unpopular clients. To the best of our ability.

Judicial candidates should be assessed on who they are, not who they've represented.

Alliance grids: More blanks filled in

$
0
0
The Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening today released updated ratings for persons seeking election to judicial office in Cook County in the March primary.

The Alliance of Bar Associations for Judicial Screening is comprised of the Arab American Bar Association (AABAR) (this is the newest Alliance member), the Asian American Bar Association of Greater Chicago (AABA), the Black Women Lawyers' Association of Greater Chicago (BWLA), the Chicago Council of Lawyers (CCL), the Cook County Bar Association (CCBA), the Decalogue Society of Lawyers (DSL), the Hellenic Bar Association of Illinois (HBA), the Hispanic Lawyers Association of Illinois (HLAI), the Illinois State Bar Association (ISBA), the Lesbian and Gay Bar Association of Chicago (LAGBAC), the Puerto Rican Bar Association of Illinois (PRBA), and the Women's Bar Association of Illinois (WBAI), working collaboratively to improve the process of screening judicial candidates in Cook County, Illinois.

The Alliance does not include the Chicago Bar Association (CBA), which maintains its own evaluation process.

Candidates seeking screening from the Alliance must complete a lengthy questionnaire (a questionnaire that is similar to, but sufficiently different from, the separate CBA questionnaire that completion of one will not suffice for the other). Investigators are then assigned by the Alliance from any of the member groups; thus, members of Alliance groups are not necessarily involved in the vetting of any one candidate's written application -- calling references (including lawyers that have been on the other side of the candidate's cases), reviewing written submissions, and so forth. When that phase of the investigation is completed, however, and after medical waivers and ARDC (or JIB) waivers are obtained, a hearing is scheduled for the applicant. All Alliance groups are asked to participate in these hearings. Each evaluator at the hearings (representing one or more Alliance members) will have the benefit of the Alliance investigators' work, even though the investigators may not be associated with the evaluator's bar group.

So all the Alliance members start with the same investigative materials, and participate in the same candidate interviews -- but, because each group has their own evaluators present for the interviews, they do not always reach the same conclusions.

The CBA issues written findings explaining its evaluations. Two of the Alliance members, the ISBA and the CCL, issue written findings to the public as well. The other Alliance members may or may not explain their ratings to individual candidates; whether they do or do not, however, these explanations are not made public.

Much of the evaluation process is confidential. Candidates do not learn which lawyers said what about them, good or bad. Candidates and evaluators all sign promises not to disclose what is said at a candidate's interview.

Different Alliance groups give different ratings. Some Alliance groups will issue no rating other than Qualified/Not Qualified or Recommended/Not Recommended. The Chicago Bar Association issues a Highly Qualified Rating, as do some Alliance members. Others offer a Highly Recommended rating. The CCL issues positive ratings of Qualified, Well Qualified, or Highly Qualified.

As you review these grids, keep in mind that, HQ = Highly Qualified, WQ = Well Qualified, Q = Qualified, NQ = Not Qualified, HR = Highly Recommended, R = Recommended, and NR = Not Recommended.

All Alliance members automatically give an "NR" rating to candidates who do not have enough years in practice or who failed or refused to participate in the evaluation process.

The latest version of the grids, reproduced below, still contains 23 blank spaces, according to Alliance Administrator Joyce Williams. There are 13 blank spaces in the BWLA ratings, seven in the LAGBAC ratings, two in the AABA ratings, and one in the HLAI ratings.

In the version of the grids, a CCBA rating was changed from NR to R for 3rd Subcircuit candidate Regina Ann Mescall. Ratings have been added for two other candidates.

Several squares are marked only with the symbol 1. In these cases, the Alliance member was unable to get an evaluator, or a sufficient number of evaluators as required by its own bylaws, to a particular candidate's hearing. The reader will see many of these symbols in the AABAR column. In at least some of these cases, the Alliance may have decided, as permitted by its bylaws, to use a prior, but still recent evaluation of a candidate; it is my understanding that some of these evaluations may predate the AABAR's participation in the Alliance.

There may yet be further updates. If there are, I will post them here.

With all this firmly in mind, then, herewith the Alliance grids (click on any image to enlarge or clarify):


Now... if you want to see what the Chicago Council of Lawyers said about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, just click on the links in this sentence.

Similarly, if you want to see what the Illinois State Bar Association about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, click on the links in this sentence.

And, finally, if you want to go outside the grids and see what the Chicago Bar Association said about the Supreme Court candidates, Appellate Court candidates, countywide candidates, candidates in Subcircuits 1-6, Subcircircuits 7-10, or Subcircuits 12-15, just click on the links in this sentence.

Niles Township Dems back Silverstein and Foutris in 9th Subcircuit races

$
0
0

Former St. Rep. Lou Lang, the Niles Township Committeeman, is out with a mailer urging votes for Ira I. Silverstein (Axelrood vacancy) and Basileios "Bill" Foutris (Luckman vacancy) in the 9th Subcircuit. (Found this morning on Facebook.)

Ald. Cardenas offers endorsements in several Cook County judicial races

$
0
0
That's not the proper headline on any other site.

Here, however, it is almost beside the point that 12th Ward Ald. is trying to unseat State Sen. Antonio "Tony" Munoz as Committeeman of the 12th Ward, or that Cardenas is backing Munoz's challenger for Munoz's State Senate seat.

For our purposes, the news is that Ald. Cardenas has endorsed Justice Jesse G. Reyes for the Supreme Court and Judge Sandra Gisela Ramos for the Neville, Jr. vacancy on the Appellate Court. Cardenas also departs from the Cook County Democratic Party's slate by endorsing Joseph Chico for the countywide Mason vacancy.

In the 14th Subcircuit, Cardenas urges support for Judge Gerardo Tristan, Jr. (Bertucci vacancy) and Perla Tirado (over Judge Daniel O. Tiernan) for the Lacy vacancy.

This is another palm card I found this morning on Facebook.

Ricky Hendon offers Cook County judicial endorsements

$
0
0

Former State Sen. Ricky Hendon, now the proprietor of CBD Chicago, is circulating a list of his preferred choices in the 2020 primary. (Yes, I saw this on Facebook, too.)

For the Illinois Supreme Court, Hendon endorses Justice Nathaniel Roosevelt Howse. For the Appellate Court, Hendon supports Judges Carolyn J. Gallagher for the Neville, Jr. vacancy and Sharon O. Johnson.

In countywide Circuit Court races Hendon recommends Tiesha L. Smith (Bellows vacancy), U. O'Neal (Ford vacancy), Arthur D. Sutton (Mason vacancy), Russell W. Hartigan (C. Sheehan vacancy) and Wendelin "Wendi" DeLoach (K. Sheehan vacancy). The only countywide endorsed judicial candidate on Hendon's list is Judge Sheree Desiree Henry (Murphy Gorman vacancy).

In the race for the Jackson vacancy in the 7th Subcircuit, Hendon urges support for Pamela Reaves-Harris.

LGBTQ Impact offers endorsements in Cook County judicial races

$
0
0

Just before any election a host of groups come out of the woodwork, offering their recommendations for this office, or that one. Many of these groups go dormant the moment the polls close; many will not resurface again.

Pictured above is a palm card from a group called LGBTQ Impact. The group has a website (that's a link in the preceding sentence) and I can say with certainty that this is at least the second election cycle in which LGBTQ Impact has tried to make an impact -- I found a 2018 palm card on my computer this morning, though it does not look as though I had time to post it here.

For the Illinois Supreme Court, LGBTQ Impact recommends Justice Nathaniel Roosevelt Howse. In the two contests for the Appellate Court, the group offers support for Justices Michael B. Hyman (Neville, Jr.) and John Griffin (Simon vacancy).

In contested countywide Circuit Court races, LGBTQ Impact follows the official Cook County Democratic Party ticket with the exceptions of Cristin Keely McDonald Duffy (Bellows vacancy), Kelly Marie McCarthy (Coghlan vacancy), Joseph Chico (Mason vacancy), and Russell W. Hartigan (C. Sheehan vacancy).

In subcircuit races, LGBTQ Impact offers support for Judge Sondra Nicole Denmark (2nd Subcircuit, "A" vacancy), Bradley R. Trowbridge (8th Subcircuit, Fleming vacancy), Maire Aileen Dempsey (10th Subcircuit, McGing vacancy), Audrey Victoria Cosgrove (10th Subcircuit, O'Brien vacancy), and Judge Daniel O. Tiernan (14th Subcircuit, Lacy vacancy).
Viewing all 3041 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>